Read classic readings and cases in the philosophy of law reviews, rating & opinions:Check all classic readings and cases in the philosophy of law reviews below or publish your opinion.
100 Reviews Found
where to lasix in Omaha online can u lasix over the counter top 11 best locations to lasix in Canada cost of lasix for dogs get lasix prescription how to lasix in Omaha cheap lasix in Fresno lasix dosage purchase lasix from Austin
best for lasix in Poland top 5 best locations to lasix in United States where to generic lasix where to lasix in Japan top 9 best locations to lasix in Israel buy lasix online with prescription lasix online pharmacy in Oklahoma cheap lasix in Indianapolis buy lasix in Portland
lasix online from Seattle buy lasix online from UK how to lasix in Portland lasix from Los Angeles lasix buy lasix online from San Diego where to lasix in Kansas online buy lasix in Sweden lasix online pharmacy in United States
cost of lasix lasix online canada lasix in Omaha where to lasix in Austria where to lasix in Detroit where to lasix in Memphis price lasix purchase lasix from Fresh York where to lasix in El Paso
Just played Guns of Glory on a phone application via mistplay reviews. Played this one with amazing interest as on the mobile you got the impression of controlling your characters on the ground level, helping catch pick pockets etc etc. Like all mobile ads this was misleading. Don't obtain me wrong the android game itself was addictive and you can spend hours playing (If you play via mistplay you can earn a fair few Amazon vouchers), but yeah false advertising? Really? Unfortunately this is a huge pitfall a lot of android games like these fall into. For example you can expect a nice create your kitchen safe android game but instead you obtain something quite various (garden scapes see add for application and play game)
who can lasix buying lasix in canada how to lasix in Norway best for lasix in Long Beach where to lasix in Washington how can i lasix best method to search lasix in Czech Republic where is better to lasix cheap lasix in Singapore where to lasix in Fresh Orleans online
where to lasix in Sweden buy lasix in San Francisco where to lasix in Baltimore online lasix 40mg cheap lasix in San Antonio top 7 best locations to lasix in Hungary top 9 best locations to lasix in Netherlands purchase lasix from Saudi Arabia buy lasix online from Washington buy furosemide
top 10 best locations to lasix in San Jose buy lasix in Buffalo lasix from Portugal where to lasix in Pittsburgh online purchase lasix from Belgium purchase lasix from Buffalo buy lasix in Germany where to lasix in Saudi Arabia online furosemide purchase lasix from Portland buy lasix in Denmark
where to lasix in Phoenix online top 8 best locations to lasix in Omaha lasix online pharmacy in Denmark where to lasix in Tucson online best method to search lasix in San Francisco how much does lasix cost where to lasix in Austria best for lasix in Fresh York
where to lasix in Boston canada lasix generic top 6 best locations to lasix in Los Angeles where to lasix in Toledo buy true lasix where to lasix in Greece online best for lasix in United Kingdom best for lasix in Austin best for lasix in Japan
lasix in Tucson lasix online pharmacy in San Francisco lasix online pharmacy in Kansas buying lasix best method to search lasix in Charlotte top 3 best locations to lasix in Indianapolis best for lasix in Norway
The publisher should be ashamed of this paperback version. For a $100 book, the binding cracks the first time you begin it to read, and the pages start to fall out. This is ridiculous! How much more would it have cost to use proper binding glue?If the book is needed for a class, I would suggest a hardcover version. If you have other options, look for a philosophy of law textbook ever, the reading material itself is beautiful comprehensive and well place together.
I bought this as a textbook, but could definetly read it as a book. It is a collection of various essays on the philosophy of law, and is well place together, and simple to obtain through. The material is tough, but if you are intersted in philosophy of law, you should obtain used to tough materials.
I used this book for my Philosophy of Law class. It’s a fine read. However, I bought it used not thinking much of it only to search that almost every page has been written on. The condition ruined it for me. Almost every page is like the one attached or worse.
Not good textbook. Words covered were not in Wikipedia, and the only effect on Google was linked to said author. What is the point of learning words that have no app since no one else in the legal or philosophical globe uses them?
It's almost like when you had to know latin in to read the bible, except it's the 21st century and we're still needed to read a law book that belongs in the early 20th century. It's too verbose and not very clear for most readers. When one is taking a lot of classes in college and time is not on your side, this book is a nightmare.
Surprisingly, the book was received in a timely manner. I was just a bit disappointed because of the huge puncture (from some instrument) that penetrated the front hard cover. I was grateful it did not go further into a lot of pages, but generally I was satisfied.
This is a chilling and compelling look at how juveniles, especially teens, are viewed in legal terms. It reads like a novel as the info unfold from various perspectives until a amazing courtroom showdown. Tanenhaus is a brilliant legal historian with the eye of a novelist. Can't recommend it highly enough for book clubs and library discussions.Every high school history class should read & discuss! 4 stars
This book is very useful in to understand the coorelation between society and law. Futhermore, it helps understanding the concept of justice. Thanks to the seller I was able to complete a lot of complex assigments for my college. I highly recomment this seller for people who wish to have serios transcations without delays.
This book lays out the history of philosophy in an engaging narrative and even contains sections of major works in the latter half. Enjoyed reading it for a class on the same subject. The rental book I was given was in beautiful poor shape though so be aware of that if you decide to rent it.
TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - AN ACCESSIBLE, FOCUSED ANDTHOUGHT-PROVOKING STUDYCONTAINING BRAND NEW MATERIALAn appreciation by Phillip Taylor MBE and Elizabeth Taylor of Richmond Green ChambersThere are 14 titles in the much acclaimed `Routledge Philosophy Companions' series, and `The Routledge Companion to Philosophy Of Law' is the latest. Certainly this is the title that will confer maximum interest and benefit to students of law and for that matter, experienced practitioners as well.Under the able editorship of Professor Andrei Marmor of the University of Southern California, the book presents a compendium of leaned articles and essays by no less than 39 academics from a who's who of distinguished universities worldwide, from, for example, the University of California at Berkeley, to Oxford and e aim of the book is to provide, in our opinion, thoughtful, scholarly, precisely analytical, yet clearly expressed examinations of an amazingly wide range of jurisprudential problems which lie within the purview of `philosophy of law'. The publishers assure us that the content is entirely fresh and written specifically for newcomers to the field. For undergraduate and graduate students in law and/or similar fields, this book is a e essays are grouped logically under six categories which include: Theories about the Nature of Law... Legal Reasoning... Theories of Legal Areas... Law as a Coercive Order... Moral Obligations to Law... and Rights and Equality.Under the latter heading there is much thought provoking commentary on some very topical problems relating to freedom of speech, including equality, rights and privacy.`Is pornography speech?' is one of the questions asked, or is it an act? Part II on Legal Reasoning is also noteworthy, as is Part III --Theories of Legal Locations -- which contains articles on criminal law, contract, torts, property, family, evidence, international law and environmental Marmor points out in the Preface, the essays are introductory in nature and while they don't assume that the reader will have any prior knowledge of this field, they do `try to advance the ball.' `As readers will come to realize,' he continues, `philosophy of law is very close entangled with other philosophical areas, in particular, moral and political philosophy' and so forth.If you are a law student studying jurisprudence this book will both expand and clarify any number of problems for you while enhancing your understanding of the topic matter, which is often considered abstruse. Even for the non-philosophers among us, the book includes much meal for r your further enquiry and research, there are extensive bibliographical references and suggestions for further reading, as well as a detailed index at the back for ease of use. The publication date is 2012.
The book came to me beautiful much torn up, maybe it’s because I rented it. The pages were all normal but the covers looked very poor like if children were playing with it maybe. Everything else is in tact so that’s a plus. The was really and that created it so simple for me. I really am satisfied about the of this rental
I was familiar with a lot of of these cases to start with, since I am a political science instructor, but this book was an awesome read. Having these stories compiled together in one collection really gives you the sense of how incredibly arrogant and myopic the American government has historically been when it comes to the native population. Very well written, and does not require any previous knowledge. Each chapter is self-supporting and the collection together creates a strong image. Unbelievable book and an perfect resource.
Amazing compendium of the classic pieces. I'm using it as a textbook in an MBA course on compensation at a Christian university. It's not a "sit and read beginning to end" it's a "read some here and there as you build your knowledge of the problems in the social impact space"
White Mans burden?By: Robert A. YingstIt is difficult to read In the Courts of the Conqueror; The 10 Worst Indian Law Cases Ever Decided, without being conflicted, especially if you are white. Nevertheless, whether you are Indian, black or white you will be challenged if you read this book. I promise. Having been a white civil rights lawyer in what the author calls the Courts of the Conqueror, I found myself looking at Indian Country in a method which was both enlightening and promising, in spite of being constantly reminded of what the author calls the "darker side of Indian Law."Attorney Walter R. Echo-Hawk gives lawyers especially, a challenging path as he asks the question - What if it is really real that the bundle of rights we have fought for through the 5th and 14th amendments in the U.S. Constitution were never intended by the "founders" to be applied to Native Americans?Of the 10 worst cases, Echo-Hawk cites one case in particular for repudiation and rejection from future influence in the law - Johnson v. M'Intosh. A case which continues to define the contours of Indian Law. In 1955 the Supreme Court relying on M'Intosh in Tee-Hit-Ton v. United States takes it as a given that "savage tribes of the continent" were deprived of their land for "trinkets" by the "conqueror's will".Johnson v. M'Intosh will live on to cause repeated wrongs in Indian Law unless this case is overturned and prevented from carrying future influence argues the the author. It must be overruled in the same method that Plessy v. Ferguson met its demise in Brown v. Board of Education, when segregation was rejected by the Supreme Court, says e author's approach in describing how we got to this point is artful and interesting to read. It may be that some will chafe as he takes us through some poor times and locations to present us that phrases like, "water under the bridge" are not enough to place this past behind us in any responsible method without addressing in the e app of the First Amendment in Native American cases is one example he uses to argue that the Supreme Court does not really with Native American religion as religion. The Rehnquist Court was "not up to this task" he says and urges that Lyng v Northwest Indian Cemetery Association must be overturned. The high court failed to protect Indian holy locations and produced a "cruelly surreal result" when it pronounced in the words of dissenting Justice Brennan: "Government action that will virtually destroy a religion is nevertheless deemed not to `burden' that religion." Lying is still the law of the ho-Hawk 8 specific reforms as he calls for a fresh generation of "legal warriors" who have the courage to "..row versus the tide of prejudice, racism, dispossession, and oppression of vulnerable minorities."Robert A. Yingst is a civil rights lawyer from Abrams, Wisconsin
Not for the squeamish or self satisfied! Echo-Hawk speaks to a quality of justice which is probably unobtainable. Never the less, this is a very necessary work and an antidote to the Manifest Destiny narrative of westward expansion.
It amazes me that laws continue to be a governing part of our native American cultural heritage. Echo-Hawk has given us insight and understandings that can only be gleaned from an objective legal approach of existing court decisions. This may be more for a legal scholar review yet is written in less legal jargon for all of us to understand the peculiarities of why court decisions were handed down in the language that defames, deflates and undermines the very natural of occupancy, title, ownership and residency of native Americans. Echo-Hawk gives a sense that we can change the future by changing the decisions that were created in the past.
I had the general idea that white people took the US from the Indians by deception and force, but I had no idea that our courts enabled all of that. These opinions are twisted out of all relation to the Constitution so that the white party can win. Well written, simple to read paperback format, heavily end-noted so you can check the author's claims, or just search more reading on the topic.
This is a truly amazing book. A must-read for anyone interested in United States Federal Indian Echo-Hawk is a truly inspirational character. His writing style is academic but on a level that is accessible to non-academics. I highly recommend this book.
Perfect book and the contents are interesting to read. Will use the Go-Road info case for curriculum to be used by our local high school civics class on Indian court cases since this case involves the local Indians of our region in Northwest California.
Natural Law Theory (NLT) was widely discredited by David Hume in his Treatise on Human Nature (1740) and by G. E. Moore in his Principia Ethica (1903), both well before this book was published in Germany during the rise of Nazism. For historical assessments, several texts do a much better job in presenting the historical rise through Stoicism and finally its demise in the Age of Enlightenment. Today, only the Roman Catholic Church, and specifically its Moral Theology, embraces Thomistic Natural Law as its bogus basis for prohibitions (contraception, abortion, homophilia). If a moral reason exists for these prohibitions, it is NOT from Natural Law Theory, it is NOT from the Moral Imperative of the Hurt Principle, and it is NOT from Aristotlean Ethics. The Church and those who appeal to Natural Law Theory commit the Fact/Value Fallacy, and the notion that god built a moral system on a fallacy should place this nonsense to e best defense of NLT is Robert George, whose apologetics are elegant as they are dogmatic.
Heinrich Rommen's book titled THE NATURAL LAW was written in 1946 and published in 1947 versus the background of the rise and fall of the National Socialists and the not good tragedies of W.W. II. Rommen's book is a poignant reminder of what the law should as opposed to the will of the ruler, the party, the Volks, etc. This book is based on the Catholic Scholastics and especially St. Thomas Aquinas'(1225-1275) thinking. Rommen included the later Scholastics such as Suarez c. 1545-1618). Readers are shown a reasonable and logical view of law vs. the will of the ruler(s).Rommen with Natural Law as an attempt to reflect what religious men and women consider as a reflection of God's Law. The thinking was that since God is the Creator and author of nature, Natural Law should be an attempt to reflect God's nature rather than assigning an arbitrary will to Divine mmen's book is clear that the two views re God's nature as opposed to God's arbitrary will are necessary in understanding the temptation to impose unbridled power of rulers which can lead to tyranny and evil. St. Thomas Aquinas' views are a prominent feature of the book. Rommen reminds readers that people should test to maintain a moral code that reflects God's nature. Rommen also with the opposing view that Original Sin means that men are depraved and can do nothing right to please God. Rommen uses St. Thomas Aquinas and the later Scholastics to counter this view. Basically, Rommen argues that Original Sin did not mean that men were depraved. He argued that men were not the best they could be, and the Natural Law not only protected people from criminals, but it also provided a useful tutorial for men to act justly and fairly with other men all of whom were made in God's ese debates started c. 1300s in the disputes between the Realists and Nominalists. The Nominalists are that concepts and ideas were merely names agreed upon for philosophical debate. The Realists argued that concepts and ideas were realities and were vital to an understanding of God, Natural Law, and a just moral code. As St. Thomas Aquinas stated, the law was intended to give each man his due. The Nomialist's arguements re the lack of validity trivialized serious philosophical discussion and deprived the views of God's nature. They emphasized God's will since concepts were mere names and could not lead to Natural Law. This was a very risky concept since men could not create moral decisions since God's will precluded men from acting a moral agents. The Nominalists also argued that whatever evil occured was the will of God. In other words they ascribed evil to God which St. Thomas Aquinas the Suarez stated was impossible with God's nature. The Nominalist implied predestination to men whose fate and salvation were already determined before men were born. In other words, as Rommen makes clear, men were incapable of making moral decisions and had to accept evil as God's plan. This arguement was then used to condone the evil tyranny of unjust rulers who appointed themselves as God's lieutenants on earth. The implied arguement, later accepted in Protestant cirles, was that criticism of an unjust ruler was an attack on God. Rommen presents St. Thomas Aquinas' view that an unjust law was no law at all and led men to sensilessly act in an evil way. Suarez went so far as to argue that an unjust tyrant could lawfully be deposed as such a ruler set a poor example and committed his topics to act in complience with mmen was not a phony idealist. He was clear that no ruler or political party could make heaven on earth. Rommen argued that Natural Law and an attempt to obtain men to act in accordance with God's nature was a reasonable concept of law which could prevent the excesses of tyranny and evil. Since rulers held power, they too were needed by law to act as best they could with God's nature which admitted no mentioned above, Rommen's book was written at the end of W.W. II and was a reminder of what men suffered from blindly listening to evil rulers and political parties. The usefullness of this book could be projected to later attempts at arbitrary power regardless of political labels. One should note that the National Socialists were much less successful in German elections in Catholic regions of Germany during the 1930s, and Hitler & co. (Stalin & co. as well)hated Pope Pius XII and Catholic leaders in their domains. They knew that a relience on a reasonable Natural Law undermined their own self imposed importance. Rommen is clear about this.While THE NATURAL LAW was translated from German into English, the prose is clear. This book is a amazing introduction to Scholasticism and legal reasoning. The book is also valuable for thoughtful men who can refute the appeals to tyranny with better ideas.